<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hoki Pokey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.organicauthority.com/blog/organic/organic-food/hoki-pokey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.organicauthority.com/blog/organic/organic-food/hoki-pokey/</link>
	<description>Organic Authority - organic food, organic living, green living, organic thoughts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:43:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mixi</title>
		<link>http://www.organicauthority.com/blog/organic/organic-food/hoki-pokey/comment-page-1/#comment-15577</link>
		<dc:creator>Mixi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organicauthority.com/blog/?p=5509#comment-15577</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t believe all you read - the New York Times got it wrong.  NZ didn&#039;t &#039;formally acknowledge&#039; because it never happened.  Check out www.seafoodindustry.co.nz/hoki and you will be enlightened to the many ommissions from Broad&#039;s reporting.  Whatever happened to journalistic standards?  They look way less sustainable than the hoki fishery which top marine scientists are praising the management of and naming as &#039;world-leading&#039; and giving the highest ratings for ecologically sustainable management.  Some of that research was reported in the New York Times only a few weeks before Broad&#039;s piece.....funny, he didn&#039;t mention that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t believe all you read &#8211; the New York Times got it wrong.  NZ didn&#8217;t &#8216;formally acknowledge&#8217; because it never happened.  Check out <a href="http://www.seafoodindustry.co.nz/hoki" rel="nofollow">http://www.seafoodindustry.co.nz/hoki</a> and you will be enlightened to the many ommissions from Broad&#8217;s reporting.  Whatever happened to journalistic standards?  They look way less sustainable than the hoki fishery which top marine scientists are praising the management of and naming as &#8216;world-leading&#8217; and giving the highest ratings for ecologically sustainable management.  Some of that research was reported in the New York Times only a few weeks before Broad&#8217;s piece&#8230;..funny, he didn&#8217;t mention that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Hoki Pokey « OrganicAuthority.com – Organic Blog -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.organicauthority.com/blog/organic/organic-food/hoki-pokey/comment-page-1/#comment-15513</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Hoki Pokey « OrganicAuthority.com – Organic Blog -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 21:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.organicauthority.com/blog/?p=5509#comment-15513</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by DosPapasFritas andBadabababaa. Badabababaa said: Hoki Pokey « OrganicAuthority.com – Organic Blog: ... which has 410 calories (42% from fat) and 730 mg sodium. N.. http://bit.ly/3ShqNi [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by DosPapasFritas andBadabababaa. Badabababaa said: Hoki Pokey « OrganicAuthority.com – Organic Blog: &#8230; which has 410 calories (42% from fat) and 730 mg sodium. N.. <a href="http://bit.ly/3ShqNi" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/3ShqNi</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
