Genetically Engineered Corn Could Affect Aquatic Ecosystems

Author:
Publish date:
Updated on

An Indiana University study, recently published in the Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences, suggests a widely planted variety of genetically engineered “Bt” corn has the potential to harm aquatic ecosystems. 

Royer1

Researchers, including Todd V. Royer, PhD (right), an assistant professor in the IU School of Public and Environmental Affairs, established that pollen and other plant parts containing toxins from the corn are washing into streams near cornfields. 

They also conducted laboratory trials that found consumption of Bt corn byproducts produced increased mortality and reduced growth in caddisflies, aquatic insects that are related to the pests targeted by the toxin in Bt corn. 

Caddisflies, Dr. Royer says, “are a food resource for higher organisms like fish and amphibians. And if our goal is to have healthy, functioning ecosystems, we need to protect all the parts. Water resources are something we depend on greatly.” 

Bt corn is engineered to include a gene from the microorganism Bacillus thuringiensis, which produces a toxin that protects the crop from pests—in particular, the European corn borer. It was licensed for use in 1996 and quickly gained popularity. Last year, around 35% of corn acreage planted in the United States was genetically modified, the study says, citing U.S. Department of Agriculture data. 

Before licensing Bt corn, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency conducted trials to test its impact on water biota. But it used Daphnia, a crustacean commonly used for toxicity tests—not insects that are more closely related to the target pests, Dr. Royer says. 

If there are unintended consequences of planting genetically engineered crops, he emphasizes, farmers shouldn’t be held responsible. In a competitive agricultural economy, producers have to use the best technologies they can get, he notes. 

“Every new technology comes with some benefits and some risks,” he says. “I think probably the risks associated with widespread planting of Bt corn were not fully assessed.” 

There was a public flap over the growing use of Bt corn in 1999, when a report indicated it might harm monarch butterflies. But studies coordinated by the government’s Agriculture Research Service concluded there was not a significant threat to monarchs. Around that time, Dr. Royer says, he and his colleagues wondered whether the toxin from Bt corn was getting into streams near cornfields—and, if so, whether it could have an impact on aquatic insects. 

Their research, conducted in 2005 and 2006 in an intensely farmed region of northern Indiana, measured inputs of Bt corn pollen and corn byproducts (e.g., leaves and cobs) in 12 headwater streams, using litter traps to collect the materials. They also found corn pollen in the guts of certain caddisflies, showing they were feeding on corn pollen. 

In laboratory trials, the researchers found caddisflies that were fed leaves from Bt corn had growth rates that were less than half those of caddisflies fed non-Bt corn litter. They also found that a different type of caddisfly had significantly increased mortality rates when exposed to Bt corn pollen at concentrations between two and three times the maximum found in the test sites. 

Dr. Royer says there was considerable variation in the amount of corn pollen and byproducts found at study locations. And there is likely also to be significant geographical variation: Farmers in Iowa and Illinois, for example, are planting more Bt corn than those in Indiana. The level of Bt corn pollen associated with increased mortality in caddisflies, he says, “could potentially represent conditions in streams of the western Corn Belt.” 

Editor’s Note: OrganicAuthority.com publishes science news so organic consumers have access to the latest information on climate change and threats to our environment. You can view similar posts by visiting the Environment Section of our blog.

Related Stories